Learning Outcomes

icon of a magnifying glass over a list

The content, assignments, and assessments for English Composition II: Rhetorical Methods–Based are aligned to the following learning outcomes.

  • Create and share a completed Google Doc, using Google Drive, with editing enabled
  • Use the discussion forum to make an original post and submit replies to other students
  • Identify research types
  • Demonstrate the difference between a “homework” question and a “research” question
  • Identify the thesis of an assigned reading for summary purposes
  • Demonstrate “reading to write effectively” skills
  • Brainstorm potential topics appropriate for this course’s assignment.
  • Use initial research to answer preliminary questions (“homework questions”) you have about a topic.
  • Draft a working thesis statement on a topic of your choice.
  • Analyze a source pertaining to your chosen topic.
  • Formulate initial thesis statement for your own persuasive essay
  • Punctuate material that appears inside quotation marks in a source correctly, when using it in your own writing
  • Identify potential bias within a source
  • Compare a source’s thesis to your own working research project thesis
  • Provide an in-depth evaluation of a potential source for your research project
  • Recognize differences between APA & MLA citation styles
  • Brainstorm content, sources, and organizational ideas for your research project
  • Analyze potential audiences for a project and select an appropriate one
  • Write a rough draft of your research essay
  • Cite a variety of sources in polished MLA format
  • Annotate your citations with brief paragraphs defining the relative value of a source to your own research goals
  • Articulate a list of arguments supporting your side of a thesis, and anticipate opposition coming from opponents
  • Draft a detailed outline of a research project
  • Complete a draft of your essay that’s ready to share with peers for their input
  • Complete a Post Draft outline of your Research project, and use it to assess what structural changes should be made to your draft
  • Provide peer review evaluation for members of your peer group
  • Use peer review feedback on your own work to help guide revision
  • Detect and evaluate non-argumentative persuasive techniques—rhetorical devices such as irony, satire, anecdotal evidence, flattery and analogies, and logical fallacies—used to sway readers’ emotions.
  • Use library research skills in electronic, print, and other sources to gather support for arguments.
  • Recognize that different academic disciplines may rely on different kinds of arguments and assess what types of argument and evidence are appropriate for different fields of knowledge.
  • Write arguments appropriate to audience, occasion and discipline.